Has Skiing Got More Expensive Over Time?

Skiing costs more in cash terms than it did years ago, but the increase is not the same in every country or for every product. This article compares two long-running multi-resort passes, adjusts the older prices for inflation and puts the figures in a global ski-industry context.

Trav's short answer

Yes — but not by the same amount everywhere.

Two global multi-resort passes show the pattern. The Epic Pass rose from $579 at launch in 2008 to $1,089 in spring 2026, while the Ikon Pass rose from $899 in 2018 to $1,349 in spring 2026. After US inflation, those spring prices are roughly 20% and 12% higher respectively. Both products also offer much wider access today, so the figures should not be treated as a global ski-inflation rate.

Cash price and real price answer different questions

A price can rise for two reasons: the product itself becomes dearer, or money simply buys less than it used to. That is why a long-term ski-price comparison needs an inflation adjustment.

For example, if a pass rises from 300 to 500 in its local currency, the cash increase is obvious. The next step is to ask what the old 300 would be worth today. If the new price is still higher after that adjustment, the increase has outpaced general inflation.

For the US-dollar pass examples below, the calculation uses the US Consumer Price Index (CPI-U). For a pass priced in euros, Swiss francs, yen or another currency, the fairest comparison starts with the relevant local inflation measure.

Skiing is global, so one country cannot tell the whole story

Laurent Vanat's 2026 International Report on Snow & Mountain Tourism covers 68 countries with equipped outdoor ski areas. It reports 399 million skier visits worldwide in 2024/25, ahead of the previous record of 392 million in 2018/19.

That scale matters when discussing price. Lift passes in the United States, France, Austria, Switzerland, Japan or New Zealand are sold in different currencies and face different inflation, energy, labour and tourism conditions. There is no sensible way to take one national price rise and apply it to every ski market.

The best approach is to use clearly defined products with a long price history, then explain what changed alongside the price. The two examples below are useful because both now give access across multiple countries.

Two long-run pass examples: Epic and Ikon

To keep the comparison as fair as possible, the main figures below use early-season or spring pricing rather than a late-season price after several sales deadlines.

PassEarlier price2026/27 spring priceCash increaseIncrease after US inflation
Epic Pass$579
2008/09 launch
$1,089+88%about +20%
Ikon Pass$899
2018/19 launch
$1,349+50%about +12%

Epic Pass: $579 in 2008/09 to $1,089 in spring 2026

Vail Resorts said the original Epic Pass cost $579 for adults and covered six resorts for 2008/09. In May 2026, the company listed the adult 2026/27 Epic Pass at $1,089.

  • Cash increase: about 88%.
  • Inflation check: $579 in March 2008 is about $905 in July 2026 money using US CPI-U.
  • Difference after inflation: the $1,089 spring price is about 20% above that inflation-adjusted figure.

The product is not the same as it was in 2008. It now reaches many more destinations and includes additional benefits, so the 20% figure is a price comparison, not a claim that skiers receive 20% less value.

Ikon Pass: $899 in 2018/19 to $1,349 in spring 2026

Alterra Mountain Company launched the adult Ikon Pass at $899 for 2018/19, with access to 26 North American destinations. In April 2026, the 2026/27 spring price was $1,349; the network had grown to 77 destinations across 13 countries and five continents.

  • Cash increase: about 50%.
  • Inflation check: $899 in March 2018 is about $1,203 in July 2026 money.
  • Difference after inflation: the $1,349 spring price is about 12% above that inflation-adjusted figure.

Again, coverage changed dramatically, so the real-price increase is not a like-for-like measure of value.

Latest selling-cycle check: when checked on 19 August 2026, the official sites listed the adult Epic Pass at $1,119 and the adult Ikon Pass at $1,449. That is why comparisons should use prices taken at a similar point in the sales cycle. Sources: Epic Pass and Ikon Pass.

Has skiing got more expensive over time? Alpine ski scene illustrating long-term ski price trends

What the numbers actually say

Both examples point in the same direction: major multi-resort passes are more expensive than their launch prices even after allowing for US inflation. In the spring-price comparisons above, the real increase is roughly 20% for Epic and 12% for Ikon.

That does not produce a worldwide "skiing is X% more expensive" figure. The passes changed, their destination networks expanded and a ski holiday includes much more than lift access.

It does show why cash-price headlines can be misleading. An 88% rise sounds very different from a roughly 20% rise after inflation, and neither number tells you on its own whether the modern product offers better or worse value.

The price of a ski holiday depends on where and how you travel

Lift access is only one part of the bill. Accommodation, flights or driving, transfers, equipment hire, lessons, food and insurance can each follow a different price path.

A week in Japan cannot be measured with the same inflation series or exchange-rate assumptions as a week in France, Switzerland, Canada or the United States. Even within one country, school holidays, snow conditions, resort capacity and accommodation supply can change the price sharply.

For a global comparison, start with prices in the local currency and adjust them using the relevant local inflation measure. If you are travelling from another country, convert the result into your home currency afterwards. That keeps exchange-rate swings separate from the resort's own price change.

For the separate question of why ski trips cost so much today, see Why Is Skiing So Expensive?. This page is about how prices have moved over time.

How to compare ski prices fairly

A good long-term comparison keeps as many variables fixed as possible:

  • Use the same resort or pass product. A local day pass and a global season pass are not comparable.
  • Match the point in the sales cycle. Early-bird prices can be much lower than prices closer to winter.
  • Match the travel dates. Peak holiday weeks can distort accommodation and transport costs.
  • Compare in local currency first. Exchange rates can otherwise make a resort look dearer or cheaper even when its local price barely changed.
  • Use the relevant inflation index. US-dollar prices need US inflation; euro, franc, yen and other prices need an appropriate local measure.
  • Record what changed. More destinations, new lifts, added benefits or different restrictions can make an old and new product less like-for-like.

Once those points are controlled, the remaining difference is much more meaningful.

Frequently asked questions

Has skiing got more expensive over time?

Yes in cash terms. After inflation, the size of the increase depends on the product and country. In the two multi-resort pass examples here, spring prices are roughly 12% to 20% above their inflation-adjusted launch prices.

How much has the Epic Pass increased since 2008?

The adult pass rose from $579 for 2008/09 to $1,089 in spring 2026 for 2026/27, an 88% cash increase. After US inflation, the difference is about 20%.

How much has the Ikon Pass increased since 2018?

The adult pass rose from $899 for 2018/19 to $1,349 in spring 2026 for 2026/27, a 50% cash increase. After US inflation, the difference is about 12%.

Does that mean every ski holiday is 12% to 20% more expensive?

No. Those figures apply to two pass products. Accommodation, transport, hire, lessons and food vary by market, and both passes now cover many more destinations than when they launched.

Why compare prices in local currency first?

Because exchange rates can move independently of resort prices. Local-currency comparisons show what the resort actually changed; currency conversion shows what that change means for a traveller from another country.

Yes in cash terms, and the two long-run pass examples here are also higher after US inflation. The spring-price gap is about 20% for Epic and 12% for Ikon. But skiing is a global market, the products have expanded, and there is no single percentage that describes every resort or every holiday.

So, has skiing got more expensive?

Yes in headline cash prices, but there is no honest single percentage for skiing as a whole. A verified Epic Pass comparison shows an 88% cash-price rise from 2008 to 2026 and roughly a 20% rise after US inflation. The modern pass also covers much more, so even that example is not perfectly like-for-like.

  • Epic Pass 2008/09 to 2026/27 spring: +88% cash; about +20% after US inflation.
  • Ikon Pass 2018/19 to 2026/27 spring: +50% cash; about +12% after US inflation.
  • Global context 399 million skier visits were recorded worldwide in 2024/25; price trends still vary by country and product.
[post_comments]

More ski data and cost guides

Keep exploring

All posts

Useful next pages

Ski Statistics Why Is Skiing So Expensive? How Many People Go Skiing Each Year? Ski Holiday Tips Resort Comparisons Best Ski Resorts Beginner Ski Holidays Ski Holiday Types
Back to top